A picture of "Pictures"?

Monday, June 14, 2010 by Zack French
I have had a fascination with foreign languages since high school and have attempted to learn several – whether in school, at home, in full-immersion summer courses, or just by hanging out with foreign people in general.  To much avail, I speak no other language well, apart from a few phrases which amuse my 5-year-old son.  This fascination occurred when I read Ciardi’s translation of Dante’s Inferno and simultaneously (and coincidentally) learned a phrase in my Latin class, omni traductor traditor, or “every translator is a traitor.”  (Ironically I must translate this phrase, assuming that the reader does not know Latin.)  Simply put, the original is the true source, and any translation of it will result in contamination.  So to do this right, I need to learn Italian before I attempt to understand the Inferno as Dante intended?  Fantastico!

Some purists may think the same applies to music.
 
Take Mussorgsky’s Pictures at an Exhibition.  The original piano suite of 1874 has been orchestrated, rearranged and edited by numerous composers and musicians.  The most well-known is Maurice Ravel’s orchestration of 1922.  While this is the most commonly performed, there are over 100 different arrangements and orchestrations but only about a quarter are written for standard orchestra.  Among the rest includes some surprising examples like one for solo accordion, one for 45 pianos (!), and even one for tuba quintet.  Some of you may even recognize Mussorgsky’s piece from the 1971 live album of the same name by Emerson Lake and Palmer, which offered a certainly unique (and distortedly electronic) interpretation.
 
Maurice Ravel was a master of orchestration and used oddly-paired instruments and instrument sections to achieve new orchestral colors.  Just listening to a few strains of Bolero will give you enough of an example.  For example, midway through Bolero Ravel gives the main theme to the celeste (a small keyboard whose hammers strike small bells instead of strings) and solo horn, but writes the same melody three steps higher in one piccolo and five steps higher in the other, creating the impression you are listening to a pipe organ with its natural overtones.  Serge Koussevitsky (uncle of former ISO music director Fabien Sevitzky – note the abbreviated surname) made the perfect choice when he commissioned Ravel to orchestrate the work for his own use.  He knew Ravel would create a masterpiece from Mussorgsky’s already-masterful piano work which up to that point was relatively unknown.
 
So the question of the day: which is more effective – the original piano version or the Ravel orchestration?  Even if the latter is more effective, does it betray Mussorgsky’s objective?   Personally, I find the “Promenades” (the music you hear as the viewer “moves” from one painting to the next within the gallery) are more effective on piano, though the vignettes based on the pictures are more beautifully illustrated with the use of full orchestra.   Hear what Ravel does to a movement like Bydło (“cattle” in Polish).  It describes a large heavy cart drawn slowly by oxen.  In the piano version, it begins loudly, as if the cart was standing before you (or perhaps is taken from the viewpoint of the cart driver), and remains that volume throughout the entire movement.  Ravel’s orchestration, however, begins quietly, gradually increases in volume as the cart conceivably moves closer to you and then fades away into the distance.  Again, a simple idea yet completely effective; though based on dynamic markings in Mussorgsky’s piano score, it was not the original intention of the composer.  Improved or contaminated?  Or perhaps just different?  Normally orchestral works were reduced to piano score to expand their popularity (a music fan is more likely to have a piano, not a 90-piece orchestra, sitting in his or her living room), but in this case it is the opposite – the orchestral version put Pictures on the map.
 
Because MP3s imbedding is not possible in this blogware, please forgive my use of YouTube clips. The first is of Sviatoslav Richter performing the original piano version of the concluding movements of Pictures at an Exhibition, entitled Baba Yaga, or the Hut on Fowl’s Legs followed by The Great Gate of Kiev; the second clip is of Herbert von Karajan leading the Berlin Philharmonic in the same movements using Ravel’s orchestration.  
 

What do you think?   Please post your thoughts in the comment section below.  What works in the piano version that does not in the orchestral version?  Vice-versa?  Does Ravel “spice up” the original version with orchestral colors or does he ruin the composer’s intent?
 
Watch/listen/comment here, or decide for yourself if you attend the opening Symphony on the Prairie concert this weekend.  The ISO will be performing Ravel’s orchestration of Mussorgsky’s Pictures at an Exhibition on Saturday, June 19 at 8pm.  I would personally love to hear comments online or in person! 
 
Ciao ~

Resurrecting Mahler's Second Symphony

Friday, May 14, 2010 by Zack French

 

Author with likenessJames Joyce once said that if the town of Dublin were ever erased from the planet, it could be rebuilt brick by brick from the detailed descriptions in his own novel Ulysses. Conceivably he was not talking about structural designs or the type of brick and mortar that formed its walls, but in a word, its essence. It is that which is unsaid, unspeakable, and indescribable, and many artists struggle to capture the spirit of their inspiration. Few artists actually attain this goal, though perhaps its comprehensibility is left up to the listener, reader or viewer to make that judgment. For me, Mahler’s Second Symphony is the culmination of so many emotions: ferocity – serenity – chaos – cynicism – peace – the sublime. It portrays the unspoken possibility of existence after death and seems to create its own philosophy within its ninety-minute span.

The term "Resurrection" is taken from the title of a hymn by German poet Friedrich Klopstock, the first eight lines of which Mahler uses in the final movement of this symphony. Mahler was inspired to use this hymn while attending the funeral of friend and fellow conductor Hans von Bülow in 1894. In addition to Klopstock’s lines, Mahler added a few of his own, too.

As any biographer of Mahler will tell you, Mahler was conflicted throughout his life regarding his religious views. Raised in a Judaic household in what is now Jihlava, a small village in modern-day Czech Republic, he later converted to Catholicism, but only as a means to an end: to become conductor of the Vienna State Opera in 1897. Even though Mahler wrote Christian-based music in his Second, Third, Fourth and Eighth Symphonies, Mahler never denied his Jewish upbringing; instead he embraced it and incorporated klezmer-style fragments into them as well.
 
In Mahler’s mind (and perhaps for many of us), death is the ultimate unknown, and he seems to use this symphony as his idealistic journey to a religious awakening. From the first movement funeral march (a Totenfeier, or Death Celebration), the soul witnesses many different realms in both life and death throughout the symphony. The second movement, based on the joyous German waltz-like ländler, is more tender and contemplative; perhaps remembering the gentle (and not so gentle) moments of earthly life. The third movement, based on Mahler’s own song Des Antonius von Padua Fischpredigt (St. Anthony of Padua’s Sermon to the Fish) recalls those in life who remain brainless despite council from those who offer wise encouragement. In the fourth movement (the first time a voice is heard in any of Mahler’s symphonies), we hear an individual who pines for a more heavenly existence.

The fifth movement alone culminates the essence of the symphony for me. If I were ever stranded on an island, this would be the music I would take with me. Its triumphant, regal and heart-stopping drama somehow speaks to me. You will hear off-stage horn calls throughout the movement, announcing the arrival of a seemingly unearthly power. The climax of the movement, beginning around the fifteen minute mark, is first heralded by a soft two-note trombone "sigh" (foreshadowing the mezzo soprano’s plaintive cry O glaube – or I believe – later in the movement) and dramatically builds energy, complete with off-stage brass band, rumbling timpani, triple-tongued figures in the horns and screaming piccolos until the entire orchestra explodes into its grandest and most powerful registers for the ultimate apocalyptic climax. And just as suddenly as it all began, it abruptly pauses – causing every heart in the auditorium to stop simultaneously. The sound of that silence is captivating, and is one of few moments in music that lifts me up and breaks me down at the same time. Mahler excels at this. He captures the essence of life, religion, nature and human emotion in his music so remarkably well that he brings the listener one step closer to illumination.

Enjoy this symphony – revel in every movement. Close your eyes and listen for Mahler’s voice to speak.  I’ve been listening to this symphony for years, and I promise you it’s there.

Personally, I owe tremendous gratitude to the artists that will work together to create this memorable weekend on May 21-22, 2010: Juanjo Mena, conductor; Karina Gauvin, Soprano; Susanne Mentzer, mezzo-soprano; the Indianapolis Symphonic Choir led by Dr. Eric Stark, and most importantly to former Music Director Mario Venzago, whose idea it was to program this glorious work again after 23 years. Vielen Dank, Maestro.

(This blog is dedicated to my graduate professor Bruce Bellingham [1938-2010] from the University of Connecticut, who taught me how to listen to Mahler’s music not just as a musician, but as a human being.)
 

Fauré’s Requiem: La berceuse de mort *

Wednesday, January 27, 2010 by Zack French
Fauré’s Requiem: La berceuse de mort *

Orchestras around the world perform Requiem masses quite regularly as part of their season.  Apart from orchestral works based on love, heroism or nature, the Requiem Mass seems to be one of the very few genres that concentrate on a particular event in a person’s life: death.  What intrigues us is how each composer utilizes the same liturgical texts from the mass proper but applies it differently in the music.

Without going into a history of each composer’s philosophies on life and death, consider for a moment the differences (and occasionally stark similarities) between three of the most well-known Requiem masses: Mozart, Verdi and Brahms.  Some may remember recent performances by the Indianapolis Symphony Orchestra and Indianapolis Symphonic Choir of the Mozart (January 2006), Verdi (June 2008) and Brahms (May 2007) Requiems, all of which have had modest success at the box office.  Perhaps we love the heart-wrenching climaxes of Mozart’s Lacrimosa (“Tears”), the fever-inducing bass drum blasts of Verdi’s frightening Dies Irae (“Day of Wrath”), or the dramatic urgency of Brahms’ Denn wir haben hier keine bleibende Statt (“For here we have no continuing place”).  While Brahms’ Ein deutsches Requiem (based on German texts from the Lutheran Bible, and not from the traditional Latin mass) is known for its compassion toward those whom are still living, other Requiems relish in the dramatic and formidable aspect of death.

The Requiem of Gabriel Fauré (pronounced “4-A”), on the other hand, is one of optimism, peace and humanity.

Fauré himself was a quiet, gentle and sincere man, and his Requiem portrays this beautifully.  It is written, not as a blatant reminder of death, but rather, as Fauré himself put it, “a joyful deliverance, an aspiration towards a happiness beyond the grave, rather than as a painful experience.”  As one who directed the music of countless funerals, Fauré wished to create something different.  His Requiem would soothe those who mourn, a gentle reminder that death is another part of life and should not be met with fear.

For those readers unfamiliar with the work, here’s what to listen for. 

Sanctus (Holy): A glorious and resounding movement featuring melodic lines by the violins interwoven with the vocal entrances.  (Note that this is the first movement which features the violins; only the lower strings were used in first two movements.)  Its rising climax “Hosanna in excelsis!” is triumphant, yielding a simple yet powerful declaration by the horns, accompanied by full orchestral accompaniment including organ.  This occurs at 1:50 in the following clip

Pie Jesu (Kind Lord Jesus): A beautifully simple movement for solo soprano and one of the most well-known in the repertory.  The premiere performance of the Requiem featured a boy soprano in this solo role, but only because women were not allowed to sing in the choir of that venue.  In subsequent performances, Fauré preferred a female soprano sing the role, due to its difficult breathing passages, long phrasing and difficult interval leaps.  This weekend this movement is sung by soprano and IU alumna Jacqueline Brecheen.  Listen here.  

Agnus Dei (Lamb of God): This movement features a very beautiful yet simple transition of tonality as the sopranos enter alone on the note “C” on the word “lux” (“light”), shifting the character into a hymn until its climax with full orchestra. (In this clip, begin listening around 2 minutes)

Libera Me Domine (Deliver Us, Lord):  This is the second of the two movements that feature the baritone solo (this weekend performed by Hugh Russell), and is perhaps the most somber of the Requiem.  It is also the movement that includes the ill-fated Dies Irae (Day of Wrath), which Fauré was hesitant to include, but was obliged by the local diocese.  Clearly announced by the sinister register of the horns, the Dies Irae is understandably dark but quite brief, but quickly rises itself up out of the depths with unison choir with a return of the main theme sung quietly by the choir. Listen here.  

In Paradisum (In Paradise): The final and most cherubic of the Requiem.  The organ provides a gentle lulling with accompanying muted strings, closing the Requiem into a peaceful serenity. Listen here.

Fauré was not a religious man, but seemed to have understood life’s journey in a very optimistic and simplistic manner.  Through his Requiem, he assures the listener that there is nothing to fear at the end of life, and that perhaps a more peaceful existence awaits us.


* I chose the French translation to honor Fauré’s gentle masterpiece, but also because “Lullaby of Death” in English sounds too depressing…

*****

Please join us this weekend to hear Fauré’s Requiem, along with Mahler’s Songs of the Wayfarer (featuring Hugh Russell) and Dvořák Symphony No. 7 ~ this Friday and Saturday nights at 8:00 PM at the Hilbert Circle Theatre, featuring the ISO debut of Finnish conductor Pietari Inkinen.

www.indianapolissymphony.org

A Musical Brotherhood: Yo-Yo Ma and Jeffrey Kahane

Wednesday, October 7, 2009 by Zack French

It is quite extraordinary how the human brain can tuck away memories into the subconscious, only to be triggered back to the surface later in life. When asked to write a blog about my experiences with Yo-Yo Ma in Louisville in May of 1999, I remembered only a few minor details about the evening. After all, my time with him and pianist Jeffrey Kahane ten years ago spanned a fraction of a day – a mere five hours, if that. My trigger for that evening was a picture of Yo-Yo and me at the post-concert reception that night, which rekindled my memory of the evening and yielded my blog entry on July 7 (see “A Heart of Gold” below).

 

On October 1, 2009, Yo-Yo Ma and Jeffrey Kahane reunited in Indianapolis for a one-night performance at the Hilbert Circle Theatre with the ISO, and what I witnessed will surely be remembered. Humanity in classical music presents itself in many different forms, but this time it was through something the audience rarely has the opportunity to witness in the performers onstage: Humor.

 

I collected both gentlemen at the hotel prior to the rehearsal. Though some guest artists of this caliber respectfully feign familiarity with management they have worked with in the past, I had a hard time believing that Yo-Yo didn’t remember me. It felt as if a day hadn’t gone by, apart from my extra ten pounds and Yo-Yo’s stylishly new glasses.   A few minutes after reacquainting ourselves, Jeffrey descended and gave Yo-Yo a hug.  It was at this point another memory triggered – I had forgotten the amazing friendship between these two men until they started laughing – and they laughed the entire way to the hall. Not just the obliging gentlemanly chuckle, but the boisterous, wheezing, gut-busting howling at each other’s jokes. Somehow, even Jeffrey’s hilarious description of the Cyclops in Homer’s Odyssey made Yo-Yo’s endless giggling explode into a high-pitched belly laugh. Both men could barely walk by the time we reached the theatre a few minutes later.

 

Yo-Yo enjoying the good vibrations of the massage chair.This brotherly friendship is equally as evident on the stage, though mutually understood in a purely musical realm. The respective communication between the two was intriguing to witness during the performance of Dvorák’s Cello Concerto. Jeffrey’s animated control of the orchestra and Yo-Yo’s exquisite mastery of the concerto produced a glorious response from the sold-out theatre, whose ranks were captivated by the encore, J.S. Bach’s Sarabande from the Sixth Cello Suite (the same movement Yo-Yo performed at Senator Ted Kennedy’s funeral this past August).

 

What is remarkable is that though I have trouble remembering my own birthday without the help of my Facebook account, I will not forget laughing hysterically at the dynamic between Yo-Yo Ma and Jeffrey Kahane and witnessing their amazing collaboration on stage for the second time in my life. Both have their own solo careers in cello and piano, respectively, and Jeffrey even manages to juggle his music directorships at the Los Angeles Chamber Orchestra and the Colorado Symphony simultaneously. But when these two musical brothers do have the opportunity to perform together, they shine, and the memory is unforgettable.

Following Botti

Thursday, August 13, 2009 by Zack French
Erik Thogerson is a recent graduate of Indiana University in trumpet performance and currently serves as an intern with the Operations and Artist departments of the Indianapolis Symphony Orchestra.  On his days off, Erik enjoys pony trekking in the Chilean countryside with his pet chincilla, Cedric.


Following Botti

 

By Erik Thogerson

 

 

Chris Botti and former teacher Fred Sautter

 

 

When comparing Chris Botti’s life to my own there are some striking similarities.  We were both born in Portland, Oregon, albeit 24 years apart.  Both of us began playing trumpet at a fairly early age, and eventually studied privately with Fred Sautter, former Principal Trumpet, Oregon Symphony.   Both of us took classes at Mt. Hood Community College and then eventually headed off to the Midwest to begin attending Indiana University. 

 

I clearly remember one of my trumpet lessons in high school when Fred told me that it’s almost impossible to tell if a student is going to go on to be great or not.  He said that there only have been three students that he has ever taught (in forty plus years of teaching) that he was sure would go on to greatness.  One of them was Chris Botti. 

 

Twelve solo albums and countless concerts collaborating with some of the greatest performers of our time later, I guess you could say that Fred was right.

 

Last May I graduated from Indiana University.  Now, this is where I think my path will start heading in a different direction that Chris’.  I don’t have the same aspirations for my career that Chris had when leaving Indiana University.  However, now that my path has led me to Indianapolis, it looks as though Chris may be following me for once.  He will be here performing with the ISO on November 24th and while we have never actually met it seems as though we will have plenty to talk about.

 

 

 

 

 

A Heart of Gold

Tuesday, July 7, 2009 by Zack French

May 10, 1999 was a Monday, and I remember it fondly. Not only was it the birthday of a dear friend of mine who ended up not accepting my mild romantic affections a few months earlier, but it was also the day I would be meeting the first of dozens of celebrities I would come to know over the next decade, and without a doubt one I would never forget.

 

With a dark blue cello case strapped tightly against his shoulders, Yo-Yo Ma stepped off the plane in Louisville, Kentucky. He approached me, warmly shook my hand and said, “Hi! I’m Yo-Yo Ma!” To all those who have ever wondered after seeing his interviews and TV specials, let the truth be told: Yes, he really is that nice. From the moment he stuffed his multi-million dollar cello into the boot of my crowded Mazda sedan, he wanted to hear only about me – even down to how big my farm was in southern Indiana, and by the end of the day he affectionately referred to me as “40-acre boy.”

 

That evening he presented a recital with pianist Jeffrey Kahane at the Palace Theatre in downtown Louisville in an unforgettable program: J.S. Bach’s Sonata in D major for viola da gamba BWV 1028, plus a set of “New” Goldberg Variations, a work comprised of six movements by various contemporary composers – Christopher Rouse, John Corigliano and Peter Schickele, among others – that were bookended (as in the original) by the evocative Aria from Bach’s own BWV 988 Goldberg Variations of 1741. The second half of the concert was the 30-minute Sonata in G minor for Cello and Piano, Op. 19 of Rachmaninoff, which was truly the musical highlight of the evening.

 

The dinner afterwards was even more memorable.

 

Even though the reservation was made well in advance, our post-11 p.m. arrival in the foyer at Vincenzo’s Italian Restaurant (complete with Yamaha grand piano) did not make us a welcome party. At first, no one could be found in the restaurant, so Yo-Yo bolted into the kitchen (with his cello still strapped to his back). I soon followed only to find him in front of the preparation sinks apologizing profusely to Vincenzo’s wife, who was livid that she had been waiting so long for such a small party. With some hesitation, her annoyance eventually abated and the one remaining waiter began to bring cold appetizers and wine. Yo-Yo helped the waiter and served us before seating himself. 


Nearly two hours later (and after the final cask of grappa had been consumed), we packed up our things and began to head out. Yo-Yo continued to thank the owner’s wife for her patience; after all, she had catered to our every detail and I noticed she was physically exhausted, but still appreciative of our gratitude. Yo-Yo noticed this too, and after whispering in Jeffrey Kahane’s ear and giving him a smile and simultaneous nod, he unpacked his cello in the foyer as Jeffrey sat down at the piano. The couple performed exclusively for her – from memory – the Andante from Rachmaninoff’s Sonata. By the end of the 6-minute movement, she was reduced to tears. The next twenty minutes were spent watching this woman shower Yo-Yo and Jeffrey with adoration.

 

The heart of this man is truly made of gold. It is without a doubt that he shows it Zack French & Yo-Yo Ma - May 10, 1999 - Palace Theatre, Louisville, KYeverywhere he goes. When you see his beaming face accept an audience’s applause, or watch as he smiles at the orchestra and its conductor following a raving performance, you know that it is genuine. He is a gift to today’s musical world, and those of us attending his return to the Hilbert Circle Theatre with the Indianapolis Symphony in October 2009 (after a 13-year hiatus) should soak up every moment. He will touch every heart in the hall, and will make it an evening to remember, as it did for me a decade ago.

 

And even though I never won the heart of my dear friend that year, she did receive an anonymous birthday gift in the mail a few days later – an autographed CD of a world-famous cellist that simply read: “Happy Birthday, Eliza. Love, Yo-Yo.”